Search for: "Sparks v. Davis et al"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2011, 10:15 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch, et al, 6:10cv111 / PACid v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:51 pm
In Woodhull Freedom Foundation et al. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
HOAs and the FHA Lau et al v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
”[35] The release admits that sometimes a company may not know much more about an incident than that it was material, as commenters highlighted.[36]Investors could overreact to these necessarily vague disclosures, even though a complete assessment would have sparked less concern.[37] Companies may also disclose an incident that is or proves to be non-material,[38] for fear of later SEC admonishment, particularly given the SEC’s warning to companies to err on the side of more… [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
Thus, Judge Sam Sparks felt the need to educate counsel in this matter when they could not agree on the scope of a third party subpoena: The utterly predictable result is shown below: It is a shame that so many lawyers believe that practicing law means unlearning everything we were taught in kindergarten. *** Oracle v. [read post]
